In the ongoing debate surrounding the future of New Zealand's state broadcasters, RNZ, and TVNZ, a fascinating power struggle has emerged. David Seymour, the ACT leader and shareholding minister for both organizations, has launched a series of attacks, suggesting impending changes for RNZ's leadership and management. This move has sparked a defensive response from RNZ, which staunchly upholds its editorial independence and warns against political interference.
The Battle for Editorial Control
Seymour's primary target is RNZ's recent appointment of John Campbell to its flagship Morning Report program. He argues that this decision should have been 'out of the question' due to Campbell's previous critical columns about the coalition government. Seymour places the blame squarely on RNZ's management, particularly chief executive Paul Thompson, insinuating that his tenure at RNZ may be coming to an end.
The government's strategy, according to Seymour, involves reshaping RNZ's board to influence management and steer the organization's direction. He believes that the upcoming board appointments will ultimately lead to changes in RNZ's management team.
Political Motives and Allegations
Seymour extends his criticism to TVNZ, accusing it of political motivation. He suggests that political editor Maiki Sherman's alleged homophobic slur incident last year makes her position untenable. TVNZ, however, defers the responsibility for the remarks to the government, stating, "We don't hold a view on the comments."
The legislation governing RNZ and TVNZ clearly prohibits ministers from directing the broadcasters regarding specific programs, allegations, or complaints, or influencing the gathering or presentation of news.
RNZ's Defense of Independence
In response, RNZ's outgoing board chair, Jim Mather, emphasizes the organization's commitment to editorial independence, stating that it is "fundamental and non-negotiable." He asserts that editorial decisions, including appointments to senior roles, are solely the responsibility of RNZ management and are made based on journalistic merit, statutory obligations, and audience needs.
Mather strongly refutes any suggestion that board appointments are intended to influence management or editorial direction, maintaining that ministers do not direct RNZ's board or management. He warns that such commentary risks undermining public trust in RNZ's independence and journalistic integrity.
Accountability vs. Independence
Seymour, however, argues that editorial independence does not equate to freedom from accountability. He believes that the government, as the board's appointee, has the right to comment when publicly owned media organizations face issues of audience loss, relevance, or public confidence.
Media and Communications Minister Paul Goldsmith supports this view, stating that the government's role is to appoint the board and set clear expectations, focusing on financial sustainability and audience growth.
A Trustworthy Brand
Interestingly, despite Seymour's concerns, the latest AUT Trust in News survey found RNZ to be the country's most trusted news brand, followed by the Otago Daily Times and TVNZ. The survey also revealed that a significant percentage of respondents were concerned about politicians publicly discrediting news and the potential decline in trust if owners or boards interfered in editorial decisions.
A Double Standard?
Seymour's actions stand in contrast to his previous criticism of former Cabinet minister Kiri Allan, who raised concerns about RNZ's treatment of Māori staff. At the time, Seymour emphasized the need for ministers to be cautious about even the perception of interfering with media. This raises the question of whether Seymour's current stance represents a shift in his principles or a selective application of his beliefs.
Conclusion
The battle for control over New Zealand's state broadcasters is a complex and intriguing power play. While Seymour argues for accountability and change, RNZ defends its independence and journalistic integrity. The outcome of this struggle will undoubtedly have significant implications for the future of media in New Zealand, shaping the landscape of news and current affairs for years to come. It remains to be seen whether Seymour's influence will lead to the desired changes or if RNZ will successfully maintain its editorial autonomy.
